Editors: Clackers / Nic
There’s a nip to the air, the clocks have gone back, and it can only mean one thing… The indoor season is underway! University Mixed Indoor Regionals has just passed, it’s the first chance of the academic year for universities to prove themselves against their local competitors. Regionals always has a few surprises, and this year is no exception. We have summarised your results and scrutinise your region to bring you a run down on what happened. First, we begin all the way up in Scotland, where a certain university manage to reign another year longer.
Photo: Loughborough Students Ultimate
The only club in the UK where two teams have qualified for University Mixed Nationals this year.
Scotland – Strathclyde stay strong!
Writer: Ed Graham
Results:
1. Strathclyde 1
2. Glasgow 1
3. St Andrews 1
------------
4. Edinburgh 1
5. Dundee 1
6. Heriot-Watt 1
-------------
7. Aberdeen 1
8. Stirling 1
Strathclyde proved themselves worthy of retaining their top seed in the Scottish region but, they did not go unbeaten on their journey. A loss to Glasgow in the pool stages was their only disappointment however, comfortable victories against Stirling and Edinburgh saw them through to the final, and a rematch against Glasgow. This game got intense and could only finish on universe point, which allowed Strathclyde to utilize their skill and call themselves the Scottish Champions for the second year in a row. Glasgow are still heading to Division 1, they fought off the likes of Aberdeen and Dundee to earn their place. Edinburgh topped their pool on Saturday with convincing wins all round but found tougher opposition on Sunday, losing key games to Strathclyde and then St Andrews in the game-to-go (to Division 1). Giving them a 4th place finish, and the top spot heading to Division 2 from Scotland. St Andrews had a strong performance and came out on top when it mattered, especially in the game-to-go (to Division 1), where they won 8-7 over Edinburgh.
Two more spots going to Division 2 remained after Edinburgh. Dundee taking victory over Aberdeen secured their place but, in a final game-to-go, it appeared that Nationals was not for Aberdeen as they lost against Heriot-Watt in their last game of the weekend. The Scottish universities are always a force at Nationals and this year will be no different. Keep an eye out, as the top three teams of this region will be looking to push for the top prize once more.
The North – Newcastle push to victory.
Writer: Hately
Results:
1. Newcastle 1
2. LJMU
3. Durham 1
---------------
4. Liverpool 1
5. Lancaster 1
6. Northumbria 1
----------------
7. Durham 2
8. Newcastle 2
The biggest surprise of the weekend was Manchester 1. They’ve had a tough time of late, with a large proportion of the first team players (Steve Dixon, Robbie Kyme, Natasha Torres-Coote) graduating, and leaving university Ultimate behind. A lack of cutting-edge play saw them lose three pool games and eliminated from Nationals contention before the Sunday knockout stages began. Although they had a big win; including comfortably beating Northumbria (who qualified for Division 2) in their last pool game.
The remainder of the region played out more predictably. Newcastle 1; utilising their range of strong women, carried a winning streak throughout all of their games. Lancaster 1 were the other stand-out team from Pool A; they ended up in second place. The second pool finished with LJMU comfortably at the top, primarily through patient offence looking to isolate athletic female receivers downfield. Their only close pool games were a 9-9 draw vs Liverpool 1 and a 5-4 victory over Durham 1, who finished second and third in Pool B, respectively.
The knockout stages saw Liverpool 1 throw away a four-break lead against a resurgent Newcastle 1 to lose by one, and a confident 8-6 victory for LJMU over Lancaster 1. Newcastle eventually ran out the final as champions, winning 10-7 vs LJMU. An exhausted Liverpool dropped down to forth missing out on Division 1 qualification due to a 12-3 loss in a rematch vs Durham, whilst Lancaster settled in fifth. Northumbria took the final spot going to Division 2, winning the game-to-go 9-8 against a strong Durham 2.
The three teams that qualified for Division 1 can look forward to Nationals knowing that there will be squads capable of playing at an equally competitive level. All have both strong women and men however, the depth of their rosters will be challenged. Durham to finish top 8 is a safe bet; assuming their mental game holds out, and both LJMU and Newcastle to avoid the bottom four.
Dream Line: Will Collier (Durham), Kate Gibson (Newcastle), Tom Jackson (LJMU), Grace Prior (LJMU), Emily Atkinson (Newcastle)
Yorkshire and East Midlands – Nottingham power through the region.
Writer: Maya Israel
Results:
1. Nottingham 1
2. Loughborough 1
3. Sheffield 1
4. Huddersfield 1
-----------------
5. Leeds 1
6. Loughborough 2
------------------
7. Leicester 1
8. Nottingham Trent 1
If it was predicted who would finish at the top; Loughborough 1 and Sheffield 1 would be right up there taking into account their fifth and ninth place finish at Nationals last year, and Huddersfield 1 and Nottingham 1 would have been battling for the last Division 1 places.
These predictions didn’t quite pan out, although the top 4 were the same. Nottingham 1 shocked everyone on Saturday, capping Loughborough 1 15-6, to top their pool. In retrospect, having lost half of last year’s team, including both captains, Loughborough 1 were due to have a tougher weekend than usual. Huddersfield, on the other hand, powered through their pool, despite having only two girls on Saturday, meaning they were beating teams whilst only having four players on the pitch for half of their games!
Loughborough 1’s earlier loss to Nottingham meant they had a slightly tougher journey to the final however, following a win over Sheffield in their semi; Loughborough failed to prevail over Nottingham for a second time and finished in second place. Sheffield 1 achieved third place after managing to overcome Huddersfield’s three pass scores with clinical defence. And Huddersfield put up a fight against a formidable Leeds team in the game-to-go (to Division 1), clutching the final Division 1 space on universe point.
Loughborough 2 deservingly took the second and final Division 2 spot having played exceedingly well all weekend, and are the only second team to qualify for Nationals in the country this year.
West Midlands and Wales – Birmingham squeeze ahead…
Writer: Hately
Results:
1. Birmingham 1
2. Warwick 1
3. Cardiff 1
-------------------
4. Bangor 1
5. Aberystwyth 1
----------------------
6. Swansea 1
7. Birmingham 2
8. Warwick 2
The West Midlands and Wales region contains some of the largest clubs in UK University Ultimate, with Warwick, Birmingham and Cardiff all providing a wealth of squads in this year’s competition. With the additional presence of Bangor, Swansea and Aberystwyth all battling for 5 Nationals spots, this year’s Regionals was always going to be close. Birmingham managed to improve on last year’s second place finish to clinch their region. Whilst last year they lost out to Bangor on universe, instead they held their nerve and defeated Warwick in the same manner. This is a credit to the depth and hard work of the Birmingham club, to lose key players such as Eddie Mason, Adam Vaslet and Georgia Morrison, and yet still improve on their results from last year.
If Birmingham have maintained their strength, then Warwick have matched them step for step. Whilst Warwick again lost to Birmingham in the final game of the weekend, the deficit was reduced from 4 to a single point when compared with last year. Their only loss of the whole weekend, and confirming them a spot at Division 1 Nationals.
The final Division 1 place was snapped up by Cardiff, narrowly missing out on the final. They comfortably dealt with a Bangor squad in transition, in the game-to-go (to Division 1). Bangor, perhaps paying the price for a lack of experience besides the top of their roster, will still be pleased to be leaving with a ticket to Division 2. Fifth place was claimed by Aberystwyth, who saw off a challenge from Swansea to claim the final Division 2 spot. Swansea had an easier route to the game (a 10-0 victory over Warwick 2) but were unable to recreate this form for the big occasion.
East and London – Can’t upturn UCL?
Writer: Maya Israel
Results:
1. UCL 1
2. KCL 1
----------------
3. Hertfordshire 1
4. Cambridge 1
----------------
5. Brunel 1
6. UCL 2
7. Cambridge 2
8. LSE 1
Considering the East and London region, University College London (UCL) 1 and King’s College London (KCL) 1 seemed obvious contenders for Division 1 spots, both being strong teams who finished second and sixth at Nationals last year, respectively. Which teams would qualify for Division 2 was less certain, but it was shocking that neither teams who snagged those places last year, LSE 1 and Imperial 1, were able to do so again.
On the Saturday, Hertfordshire, who just missed out on a Division 2 spot last year, managed to top their pool, beating Imperial 1. Cambridge, who finished sixth last year, also topped their pool, beating LSE 1 in a close game. On Sunday, UCL and KCL convincingly paved their ways to Division 1, whilst Hertfordshire and Cambridge pushed Brunel and UCL 2 out of reach of Division 2. Surprisingly Imperial 1 and LSE 1 did not fare so well this year, falling to eighth and ninth.
Overall, the Silverbacks (UCL) proved there’s no one in the region close to their standard at this present time. They’ll definitely be in contention for one of the top spots at Nationals again this year.
The South West – Exeter back on top(?)
Writer: Nate Sanders
Results:
1. Exeter 1
2. Bath 1
----------------
3. Bristol 1
4. UWE 1
----------------
5. Plymouth 1
6. Exeter 2
7. Southampton 1
8. Bristol 2
Exeter have done one better than last year and toppled Bath in the final to complete an undefeated weekend and take the first Division 1 spot. Exeter have always been at the top end of this tournament with wins in 2015 and 2016, they’ll be overjoyed to add this one to their collection. Bath had a strong weekend, but it wasn’t enough to take home a trophy. Exeter found a run of form in the final, thanks to some clutch grabs and big blocks, and were one point up at the hooter. Bath had one possession to take the game to universe point, but a miscommunication left them looking onto the game-to-go (to Division 1) against Bristol.
Coming third was Bristol, they held seed through the groups but couldn’t get past Bath 1 in the semi-final. This game saw both teams up at various stages throughout the game, but Bath took the game by 2 points. The game-to-go to Division 1 was almost a carbon copy of their earlier foray. Bristol lost only to Bath 1 all weekend; however twice is one time too many for a spot in Division 1 and Bristol take the first Division 2 spot. Taking the final Division 2 spot was UWE, with their trademark zone and polytechnic flair, they saw off almost everyone they faced. UWE continue their recent trend of qualifying for Nationals, there could be big things on the horizon for them.
Plymouth 1 missed out after losing the game to go against UWE. Plymouth’s new style of handler weave seems to have served them well this year, which helped them see off Southampton in the quarterfinals. But Plymouth falls just shy of qualifying for Nationals this time round. Southampton finished seventh for the second year in a row despite starting out seeded third.
Dream Line: me.
The South East – Sussex are back!
Writer: Hazard
Results:
1. Sussex 1
2. Surrey 1
3. Chichester
---------
4. Oxford 1
5. Reading 1
----------
6. Oxford 2
7. Brighton
8. Sussex 2
Last year, Reading won the region, with Surrey coming second and Oxford 1 rounding off the Division 1 teams. Brighton claimed a strong forth, and Sussex beat Oxford 2 in the game to go to Division 2 Nationals. Chichester and Portsmouth rounded off the top 8.
Woking hasn’t really been known for much since it got itself a mention in the Domesday Book in 1086, but now it can be known as the place where SEUXIR 2019 occurred and some teams made Nationals and some didn’t. A lot of teams had suffered graduations since last year, and so the seedings seemed a lot more volatile this year than in previous years.
Oxford had claimed initial top seed, likely by dint of being the only team to make the journey up to St. Andrew’s for UXON in the previous season. Starting out, there were quite a few upsets: Chichester beat Oxford 1 and drew with Sussex 1; bottom seed Sussex 2 finished top eight after beating Oxford Brookes and Kent; and last year’s winners Reading only narrowly made top 8 themselves, despite being ran close by Surrey 2. Also, Oxford 2 initially made top 4 after beating Brighton in the first game on Sunday.
On Sunday, things began to settle a bit more. Sussex continued to play big plays. They got the title. Surrey did whatever they do because in three years I’ve not played them and I’m starting to think it’s personal. They got second. Chichester showed a marked improvement from last year and used a combination of hard defence and overheads to take third and the final Division 1 spot. Oxford 1 fairly handily made their way up the rankings (including beating their second team) but couldn’t finish the job as Chichester dispatched them for a second time in the game-to-go to Division 1. Reading finally started to gel to fight their way up the rankings, beat Brighton on the second time of asking, and eked out a sudden-death win against Oxford 2 to win the game-to-go to Division 2, despite throwing a callahan in the dying embers of the game.
Dream line (3 men / 3 women): Charlie Butt (Sussex), Ben Peppiatt (Reading), Jonah Varney (Surrey), Molly White (Brighton), Vicki James (Chichester), Camilla Spearing (Surrey)
There you have it, Regionals in a (fairly large) nutshell. Many surprising differences compared to last year, a testament to how closely fought the tournaments are but what do you think? Is it the amount of graduating players or the development of Ultimate in general? All that’s left is to wish everyone luck for Nationals, when we will all descend to the Midlands to battle it out to win our respective divisions.
No comments:
Post a Comment